United States v. Bertucci’s Empirical Analysis
794 F.3d 925 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 668 · 18 U.S.C. § 3563 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3668
Relies on Gall v. United States · United States v. Andis · United States v. Barajas-Nunez · United States v. Delpit · United States v. Bok
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“notation in the bond schedule was for a juvenile eagle, the district court found an actual loss amount of $5,000. But unlike Bertucci , where the defendant pleaded guilty to killing a bald eagle and a rough-legged hawk, Tree Top was only convicted of selling eagle feathers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Top“fail[s] to establish the factual or evidentiary basis necessary to impose [domestic violence] counseling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“] does contain allegations that, if proven true, would support the district court's decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.