Mead v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““We note that the doctrine of-qualified immunity does not apply to [plaintiff's] claim[ ] for ... injunctive relief.” Curtiss v. Benson, 583 Fed.Appx. 598, 599 (8th Cir. 2014) (citing Burnham v. Ianni, 119 F.3d 668 , 673 n. 7 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal from the denial of qualified immunity implicated only liability . for money damages and that qualified immunity would not protect the defendant from claims for injunctive or other equitable relief); Grantham v. Trickey, 21 F.3d 289 , 295 (8th Cir.1994) (stating that “qualified immunity does not apply to claims for equitable relief.”)).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Scott v. Benson · 175 F. Supp. 3d 1081 - Willis v. Palmer

2. “(1) whether the facts alleged, construed in the light most favorable to [Cullor], establish a violation of a constitutional or statutory right, and (2) whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation, such that a reasonable official would have known that her actions were unlawful.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Cullor v. Baldwin