Hoops v. KEYSPAN ENERGY’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 207
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where, as here, 'the alleged violations hinge on the collective bargaining agreements' definition of the terms of employment, they must be brought under the LMRA and in accordance with the agreement's grievance and arbitration provisions.' " Hoops , 794 F.Supp.2d at 379 (citations omitted). "Ordinarily ..., an employee is required to attempt to exhaust any grievance or arbitration remedies provided in the collective bargaining agreement”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the complaint specifically identifies the CBA as the source of the Defendants' obligation 'to pay the Plaintiff miscellaneous shift differentials, including shift differentials for work performed at night'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.