Case v. Case’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crafton v. Gibson · Fobar v. Vonderahe · Town of St. John v. Home Builders Ass'n of Northern Indiana, Inc. · Weppler v. Stansbury · Zwiebel v. Zwiebel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On motion and upon such terms as are just the court may relieve a party ... from an entry of default, final order, or final judgment ... for the following reasons: (1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect; [or] (2) any ground for a motion to correct error, including, without limitation newly discovered evidence, which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a motion to correct errors under Rule 59[.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. K.W. v. B.J. · Dillard v. Dillard“"`Investment plans inherently include both the rewards of growth, and the risk of losses. Thus, absent express language stating otherwise, the settlement agreement of the parties implicitly contemplated both parties sharing all of the rewards and risks associated with an investment plan.'"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he trial court did not modify the original decree as much as the court clarified the decree to reflect its original meaning.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.