Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 794 P.2d 460 - State v. Larocco

State v. Larocco’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
10
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 82 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably State v. Miller (1993), State v. Ramirez (1991)

4 federal appellate · 82 state decisions — followed in 10 states

6401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · United States v. Leon · Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he concept of expectation of privacy [is] a suitable threshold criterion for determining whether article I, section 14 is applicable.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[Clhoosing to give the Utah Constitution a somewhat different construction [than the federal constitution] may prove to be an appropriate method for insulating the state's citizens from the vagaries of inconsistent interpretations given to the fourth amendment by the federal courts.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[e}xclusion of illegally obtained evidence is a necessary consequence of police violations of [AJrticle I, [Slection 14 [of the Utah Constitution].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.