Uhls v. Uhls’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1999
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fanning v. Fanning · Deen v. Deen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““unless there is a procedural error or unless there is shown to be a clear abuse of discretion. A court does not abuse its discretion unless it acts in a manner which exceeds the bounds of reason under the circumstances, as is said to mean an error of law committed by the court under the circumstances.” Deen v. Deen, 774 P.2d 621, 622 (Wyo.1989).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dowdy v. Dowdy · Love v. Love
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.