794 So. 2d 181 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
76 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Batson v. Kentucky · Solem v. Helm · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The plain error doctrine requires that there be an error and that the error must have resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Starr v. State · Jenkins v. State“[A] party who fails to make a contemporaneous objection at trial must rely on plain error to raise the issue on appeal, because it is otherwise procedurally barred.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Starr v. State · Moss v. State“Further, [the] Court applies the plain error rule only when it affects a defendant's substantive/fundamental rights.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.