Pringle v. Shannon’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Trimble v. Gordon · 557 So. 2d 511 - Newsom v. Newsom · 355 So. 2d 667 - Richardson v. Riley · PMZ Oil Co. v. Lucroy · Ellis v. Berry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“¶ 24. The Court of Appeals stated: It is true that illegitimate children do have the right to inherit from their natural fathers. Holloway v. Jones, 492 So.2d 573, 574 (Miss.1986); Larsen, 447 So.2d at 1283 ; Trimble v. Gordon, 430 U.S. 762, 776 , 97 S.Ct. 1459 , 52 L.Ed.2d 31 (1977). Nonetheless, the illegitimate child must prove paternity by clear and convincing evidence. Miss.Code Ann. § 91 — 1—15(3)(c) (Rev.1994); Gusta, 540 So.2d at 33; Larsen, 447 So.2d at 1283 ; Crosby, 195 So.2d at 71; Hulitt, 220 Miss, at 832, 72 So.2d at 206. Further, the child must make his claim to the estate of his father within one year from the time of his father’s death. Miss. Code Ann. § 91-1-15 (Rev.1991). However, Pringle’s situation would fit into the amended section of the statute which reads: A remedy is hereby created in favor of all illegitimates having any claim existing prior to July 1,1981, concerning the estate of an intestate whose death occurred prior to such date by or on behalf of an illegitimate or an alleged illegitimate child to inherit from or through its natural father.... [The claim] shall be brought within three years from and after July 1, 1981, and such time period shall run notwithstanding the minority of a child. Id. Clearly, Pringle did not bring her claim in the statutorily prescribed time limit and therefore is barred from now bringing this claim over fourteen years late.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.