794 So. 2d 590 - Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Grant v. State · State v. Cotton · 383 So. 2d 219 - Eutsey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he [PRR] Act does not increase the maximum statutory penalty. Here the sentencing court's discretion in selecting a penalty within the statutory range is simply limited. Accordingly, proof to the jury of a defendant's release which subjects a defendant to a sentence under the Act is not required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.