794 So. 2d 595 - Mann v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Delaware v. New York · Sanders Confectionery Products Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc. · Allstate Insurance v. Maleski · Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[H]abeas Corpus petitions are not to be used for additional appeals on questions which . . . were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion. . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ppellate counsel cannot be ineffective for not raising on appeal an issue with little or no merit”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the simultaneous filing requirement in rule 9.140(b)(6)(E) and 3.851(b)(2) does apply to defendants whose convictions and sentences were finalized prior to January 1, 1994, notwithstanding the provision of rule 3.851(b)(6)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.