794 So. 2d 682 - State v. White’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 674 So. 2d 738 - Brown v. State · 389 So. 2d 313 - State v. Grooms · 685 So. 2d 1322 - State v. Watkins · Wheeler v. State · 790 So. 2d 520 - State v. Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]s ... explained in Martinez , where the defendant is represented, files a plea and is arraigned, "other process" sufficient to commence prosecution under section 775.15(5) has occurred. Cf. Watkins, 685 So.2d at 1324-25 (Altenbernd, J. concurring) (positing "if a defendant were formally notified of his or her arraignment date at first appearance" that would be sufficient "other process" to commence prosecution under section 775.15, if an information had been filed).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] prosecution is commenced when either an indictment or information is filed, provided the capias, summons or other process issued on such indictment or information is executed without unreasonable delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the attorney's knowledge is imputed to his client.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.