State v. Sumowski’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
90 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Grim (1993), In Re Adoption of CMBR (2011)
90 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Duren v. Missouri · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Wagner v. United States Bankruptcy Court · Clozza v. Bair · State v. Mallett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The policy for requiring a contemporaneous objection is to minimize the incentive for sandbagging in hopes of an acquittal and then, after an unfavorable verdict, challenge the selection of the jury which convicted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Eastburn“In order to establish a prima facie case, defendant must show that the underrepresentation of other groups was due to a systematic exclusion in the selection process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Anderson“The defendant must plead and prove a fatal departure from the statutory procedure for jury selection prior to the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.