In Re JS’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re the Primary Election of May 21, 1991 · 388 Pa. Super. 381 - In Re in the Interest of M.B. · In Re CJR
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no authority for the proposition that an order which retains the status quo is appealable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re CM“a legal custodian or other living arrangement intended to be permanent in nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re CM“a change of placement goal is appealable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re CM
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.