Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 795 F.2d 1067 - Hill v. U.S. Air Force

Hill v. U.S. Air Force’s Empirical Analysis

795 F.2d 1067 · 1986

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 15 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Ohio Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1989), Trujillo v. Williams (2006)

31 federal appellate · 15 district ·

2001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)

Relies on Perry v. Block · Parks v. United States Internal Revenue Service · Center for Nuclear Responsibility, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Ingersoll-Rand Company v. United States · Crooker v. United States Department of Justice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “directs a court to transfer an 'action' over which it lacks jurisdiction, rather than an individual claim.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Neither party urged the District Court to transfer this case, and the court did not consider the issue on its own motion .... we find that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in failing sua sponte to transfer [plaintiff's] claims against [his supervisor] in his personal capacity to the District Court in New Mexico”). 5 . Plaintiff's Amended Complaint also alleges that the September 2004 Correspondence falsely represented that the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a want of jurisdiction, ... if [transfer] is in the interest of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.