United States v. Willner’s Empirical Analysis
795 F.3d 1297 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395K (§ 1832 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395N (§ 1835 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Davis v. Alaska · Harrington v. California · United States v. Brandon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“what Medicare would do in a number of hypothetical circumstances”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.