Gortat v. Capala Bros.’s Empirical Analysis
795 F.3d 292 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2060 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 2618 (§ 19 of the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976) · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 28 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Crawford Fitting Company v. Jt Gibbons Inc Champion International Corporation · West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey · Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy · Bankston v. Illinois · Tyler v. Union Oil Company of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Supreme Court has made clear on multiple occasions that, absent explicit statutory authorization, a district court may not award reimbursement for expert fees beyond the allowances authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920 , as limited by 28 U.S.C. § 1821 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.