Sewell v. Bernardin’s Empirical Analysis
795 F.3d 337 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2707 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. · Barrow v. Wethersfield Police Dept. · Patel v. Contemporary Classics of Beverly Hills · Jin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company · Town of Babylon v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as an affirmative defense and it is clear from the face of the complaint, and matters of which the court may take judicial notice, that the plaintiff's claims are barred as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any person who suffers damage or loss by reason of a violation of this section”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.