Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 795 F.3d 34 - Allen v. Johnson

Allen v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

795 F.3d 34 · 2015

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 59 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Aka v. Washington Hospital Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by providing enough evidence for a reasonable jury to find that the employer's proffered explanation was a pretext for retaliation or discrimination.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'changes and inconsistencies' in the employer's given reasons for the decision,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “). Mr. Forkwa has failed to provide evidentiary support for his allegation that he was disciplined on June 22 due to sex discrimination and not due to Symbral's belief that he had violated specified requirements of his job. The Court will grant summary judgment to Symbral on Count I. 8 C. Retaliation Under Title VII To prove retaliation for protected EEO activities under Title VII, an employee must establish three elements: that (1) he made a charge or opposed a practice made unlawful by Title VII; (2) the employer took a materially adverse action against him; and (3) the employer acted”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.