Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 795 F.3d 682 - United States v. Lee

United States v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

795 F.3d 682 · 2015

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · United States v. Neal · United States v. Kelley · United States v. Havier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he full panoply of rights that the Constitution guarantees to criminal defendants does not extend to them”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “error 'seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reduced rights are not the same as no rights at all,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.