Robinson v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis
795 F.3d 926 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Duncan v. Walker · George Duncan Superintendent Great Meadow Correctional Facility v. Sherman Walker · Carey Warden v. Saffold · 5 Cal. 4th 750 - In Re Clark · 5 Cal. 4th 813 - In Re Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“indicated that the Supreme Court's 60-day limit is the 'benchmark' from which we will not depart without a showing of good cause,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Valdez v. Montgomery“California courts allow a longer delay if the petitioner demonstrates good cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Valdez v. Montgomery
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.