Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 795 F. Supp. 2d 677 - Cummings v. Husted

795 F. Supp. 2d 677 - Cummings v. Husted’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1450 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'n · Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd. · Pennzoil Company v. Texaco Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The four considerations applicable to preliminary injunction decisions are factors to be balanced, not prerequisites that must be met.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.