Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 795 NW2D 899 - Loper v. Adams

Loper v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc. · Stewart v. Ryan · Champagne v. United States · Missouri Breaks, LLC v. Burns · Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Lynne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the moving party meets its initial burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact, the party opposing the motion may not rest on mere allegations or denials in the pleadings but must present competent admissible evidence to show the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. Mere speculation is not enough to defeat a motion for summary judgment, and when no pertinent evidence on an essential element is presented to the district court in resistance to the motion for summary judgment, it is presumed no such evidence exists.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.