Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 795 P.2d 648 - White v. State

White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2025

18 state decisions

701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ryan v. United States Lines Co. · Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Ss Zoe Colocotroni · Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis · Smith v. Lujan · Norman v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “decline[d] to follow the earlier cases which state[d] that the [trial court] cannot consider a 60(b) motion after a notice of appeal is filed.... Wé, therefore, adopt[ed] the position adopted by a majority of courts in recent years that the trial court has jurisdiction to consider a 60(b) motion while an appeal is pending..'.'. We farther h[ejld that if the district court finds the motion to be without merit, it may enter an order denying the motion, and the parties may appeal from that or- - der. If, however, the trial court is inclined to grant the motion, counsel should obtain a brief memorandum to that effect from the trial court, and request an order of remand from the appellate court so that the trial, court can enter an order.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an appeal divests the trial court of jurisdiction and transfers jurisdiction to the appellate court, where it remains until the appellate proceeding terminates and the trial court regains jurisdiction.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the interest of preventing unnecessary delay, where any action by the trial court is not likely to modify a party's rights with respect to the issues raised on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.