Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 795 P.2d 96 - Travis v. Travis

Travis v. Travis’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2016

10 state decisions

70199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Clark · 116 Ill. 2d 528 - Airey v. Department of Revenue · Tessmar v. Grosner · 103 Wis. 2d 327 - Holbrook v. Holbrook · Dugan v. Dugan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Where goodwill is a marketable business asset distinct from the personal reputation of a particular individual, as is usually the case with many commercial enterprises, that goodwill has an immediately discernible value as an asset of the business and may be identified as an amount reflected in a sale or transfer of a business. (2) If the goodwill depends on the continued presence of a particular individual, such good will [sic], by definition, is not a marketable asset distinct from the individual.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is the value that results from the probability that old customers will continue to trade with an established concern.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “law practices cannot be bought and sold as can other professional practices . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.