795 So. 2d 1071 - Raysor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[I]n the present case the officer gave appellant warnings which are legally required only when a person is in custody and not free to leave. Because Miranda rights are not required to be read to suspects unless they are undergoing custodial interrogation, it follows that a person who has been read his Miranda rights would reasonably assume that he is not free to leave.... ... The only way appellant could have felt free to leave would have been for him to have assumed that the officer was wrong in advising him that he was entitled to court appointed counsel if he could not afford counsel right then and there.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 41 So. 3d 188 - Caldwell v. State · 985 So. 2d 602 - Caldwell v. State

2. “that when [an] officer read appellant his Miranda rights during a consensual encounter, the encounter was no longer consensual”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 984 So. 2d 592 - Luna-Martinez v. State