Berger v. Berger’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 598 So. 2d 71 - City of Holmes Beach v. Grace · 716 So. 2d 842 - Keitel v. Keitel · 669 So. 2d 1152 - Wilson v. Roseberry · 662 So. 2d 732 - Gielchinsky v. Gielchinsky · LaLoggia-VonHegel v. VonHegel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In sum, we reverse both temporary orders being appealed in this case. Because another panel of this court has now affirmed the final judgment of dissolution, none .of its provisions are stayed or superceded. Any changes or amendment to the final judgment regarding visitation, relocation, or change of custody/primary residential parent should be accomplished through the normal legal process of filing petitions for modification, giving due notice to both parties, and a determination based on the best interests of the children, after a full hearing on both sides.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Berger v. Berger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.