Rohrich v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
796 F.2d 1030 · 1986
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably Joseph T. FRUSTAGLIA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee (1987), McGraw v. Barnhart (2006)
30 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Jelinek v. Heckler · Fenix v. Finch · Brissette v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assess rationally the question at issue, i.e., whether [the claimant] was disabled at the [relevant] time.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'on the merits' necessary to constitute a de facto reopening of the earlier application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.