Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 796 F.2d 212 - United States v. Ramirez

United States v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis

796 F.2d 212 · 1986

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
September 2006
most recently cited

73 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently September 2006 · most notably United States v. Townsend (1991), United States v. Moya-Gomez (1988)

73 federal appellate ·

520198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blumenthal v. United States · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Florida v. Royer · First National City Bank v. Banco Nacional de Cuba

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the record contains no evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which a jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An appellate court will not weigh the evidence or assess the credibility of the witnesses.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.