Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 796 F.2d 223 - Widgery v. United States

Widgery v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

796 F.2d 223 · 1986

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
July 2004
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2004

19 federal appellate ·

140198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Wainwright v. Sykes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a deliberate choice not to appeal made by conscious election”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “§ 2255 court may in a proper case deny relief to a federal prisoner who has deliberately bypassed the orderly federal procedures provided at or before trial and by way of appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.