United States v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
796 F.2d 244 · 1986
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 31 U.S.C. § 5313
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · United States v. Enmons · Enmund v. Florida · United States v. Tobon-Builes · United States v. Anzalone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Reporting Act imposes no duty [upon an individual] to disclose the structured transactions to the bank, and thus a person has no fair warning that his conduct is illegal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Criminal sanctions should not he imposed for conduct which is not clearly illegal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the banks were unaware that Larson was structuring his transactions,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.