United States v. Troise’s Empirical Analysis
796 F.2d 310 · 1986
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2004 · most notably United States v. Peterson (1987), United States v. Layne (1992)
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1581 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 952
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Place · Beckwith v. United States · United States v. Ramsey · Herrmann v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 1376 ; see also United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310 , 313 (9th Cir.1986) (border searches are reasonable within the meaning of the fourth amendment “simply because the vessel or item is entering the country from outside”); United States v. Most, 789 F.2d 1411 , 1414 (9th Cir.1986) (border searches”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“need not be based on a warrant or probable cause, or even on mere suspicion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.