Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 796 F.2d 713 - Berry v. Bean

Berry v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis

796 F.2d 713 · 1986

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
June 2009
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2009

6 federal appellate ·

100198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1382 · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. O'Brien · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Parker v. Levy · Murphy v. Hunt · Orloff v. Willoughby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a party addressing only issues of preliminary relief should not ordinarily be bound by its abbreviated and only partially informed presentation of the merits.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the parties should normally receive clear and unambiguous notice to that effect either before the hearing commences or at a time which will still afford the parties a full opportunity to present their respective cases.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`the facts adduced [at a preliminary injunction hearing] often will not be sufficient to permit an informed determination of whether a direction for the entry of judgment is appropriate.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.