Manbourne, Inc. v. Conrad’s Empirical Analysis
796 F.2d 884 · 1986
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2002 · most notably Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (2002), Ordower v. Feldman (1987)
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on J. I. Case Co. v. Borak · Sampson v. Murray · Roland Machinery Company v. Dresser Industries Inc · Shango v. Jurich · Lawson Products, Inc. v. Avnet, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that it has no adequate remedy at law; (2) that it will suffer irreparable harm if the preliminary injunction is not issued; (3) that the irreparable harm it will suffer if the preliminary injunction is not granted outweighs the irreparable harm the defendant will suffer if the injunction is granted; (4) that it has a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the merits; and (5) that the injunction will not harm the public interest.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.