Cahaly v. Larosa’s Empirical Analysis
796 F.3d 399 · 2015
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Franks v. Delaware · Malley v. Briggs · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Steffel v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the purpose of making an unsolicited consumer telephone call.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to calls with a consumer or political message but [did] not reach calls made for any other purpose”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“protect[ing] residential privacy and tranquility from unwanted and intrusive robocalls”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.