Turnell v. Centimark Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
796 F.3d 656 · 2015
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Hanna v. Plumer · Roland Machinery Company v. Dresser Industries Inc · John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc. · Victaulic Co. v. Tieman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) absent preliminary injunctive relief, he will suffer irreparable harm in the interim prior to a final resolution; (2) there is no adequate remedy at law; and (3) he has a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits. Id. at 662 . Second, the court must determine, "(4) the irreparable harm the moving party will endure if the preliminary injunction is wrongfully denied versus the irreparable harm to the nonmoving party if it is wrongfully granted; and (5) the effects, if any, that the grant or denial of the preliminary injunction would have on nonparties (the "public interest”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary equitable remedy that is available only when the movant shows clear need.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e give substantial deference to the court's weighing of evidence and balancing of the various equitable factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.