State v. Berryman’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Schoonover · Jirovec v. Wood · National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. · Lee v. County Ct. of Erie County · State v. Hutchinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e ... modify the previously quoted statement to read as follows: “Had there been such an order compelling Berryman’s cooperation, and a hearing advising him that the testimony of his experts could be excluded if he failed to cooperate with the court-appointed experts, the State would have prevailed on this issue.” In all other respects, we summarily affirm the opinion of the Court of Appeals.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A defendant has no right to counsel at an examination conducted by a court-appointed expert because such an examination is not a critical stage of the proceeding to which the assistance of counsel guarantee applies. Advising a client not to cooperate with a court-appointed expert is an "obstructive tactic,” which should be prohibited. Therefore, where counsel's sole stated purpose for attending a client's evaluation with a court-appointed expert is to advise his client not to cooperate with the expert, counsel should not be allowed to attend the evaluation. Accordingly, the trial court erred in allowing defense counsel to attend Berryman’s evaluations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“On November 3, 2001, Berryman approached Keith Krieger [Keith] and his wife[ [1] ] as they were getting into their van at the Green Tree Mall in Clarksville, Indiana. Berryman grabbed [Keith,] accused him of trying to set up Berryman, and shot him in the neck. [Keith] died as a result of the gunshot, and the State charged Berryman with murder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.