State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pflepsen · State v. Tenerelli · State v. Olson · State v. Palubicki · State v. Latimer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a loss claimed as an item of restitution by a crime victim must have some factual relationship to the crime committed-a compensable loss must be 'directly caused by the conduct for which the defendant was convicted.' " 796 N.W.2d 343 , 347 (Minn. App. 2011) (citation omitted). This articulation equates "some factual relationship”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Boettcher“burden of demonstrating the amount of loss sustained by a victim as a result of the offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Boettcher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.