Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 796 NW2D 644 - Burdick v. Wolff

Burdick v. Wolff’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

35 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kansas v. Crane · Feland v. J.M. · In the Matter of Midgett · Cass County State's Attorney v. Hanenberg · Cass County State's Attorney v. R.A.S.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “proof of a nexus between the requisite disorder and dangerousness to encompass proof that the disorder involves serious difficulty in controlling behavior and suffices to distinguish a dangerous sexual offender whose disorder subjects him to civil commitment from the dangerous but typical recidivist in the ordinary criminal case.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the individual has engaged in sexually predatory conduct; (2) the individual has a congenital or acquired condition that is manifested by a sexual disorder, a personality disorder, or other mental disorder or dysfunction; and (3) the disorder makes the individual likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “require the conduct evidencing the individual's serious difficulty in controlling his behavior to be sexual in nature.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.