Schlessinger v. Schlessinger Ex Rel. Schlessinger’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (1990), Davison v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office (2004)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 3 Cal. 3d 914 - Gibson v. Gibson · Goller v. White · Falco v. PADOS · Hewlett v. George · Inanc v. Schreckengost
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The commissioner [of insurance] shall not find that a policy form, certificate, or contract of insurance or rider does not comply with the applicable requirements and standards of this title [10, Insurance,] on the ground that it excludes coverage of claims made by a member of a household against another member of the same household. Such exclusions are in conformity with the public policy of this state.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In our view, the General Assembly's enactment of section 10-4-418(2)(b) is a clear signal that this court's interpretation of the legislative declaration of purpose in the Auto Accident Reparations Act did not correspond to the purpose actually intended by the General Assembly.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“preservation of family harmony, the maintenance of legitimate parental authority and control, and the safeguarding of family assets by protecting against asset depletion resulting from a judgment in favor of the child against the parent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.