Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 796 So. 2d 1276 - Wells v. State

796 So. 2d 1276 - Wells v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. · Becker v. King · 249 So. 2d 27 - St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry · Boggs v. Wainwright · DeGale v. Krongold, Bass & Todd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Only when the lower Court changes matters of substance, or resolves a genuine ambiguity, in a judgment previously rendered should the period within which an appeal must be taken or a petition for certiorari filed begin to run anew. The test is a practical one. The question is whether the lower court, in its second order, has disturbed or revised legal rights and obligations which, by its prior judgment, had been plainly and properly settled with finality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.