796 So. 2d 284 - Brunson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 607 So. 2d 1184 - Wallace v. State · 607 So. 2d 1097 - Hewlett v. State · 754 So. 2d 1207 - Carter v. State · 271 So. 2d 445 - Leonard v. State · 753 So. 2d 449 - Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may not impose a sentence greater than the original sentence, but can sentence the defendant to the full original sentence if it deems such an action necessary. Only if the court attempts to administer a longer sentence than what was originally conferred upon the defendant will it be considered double jeopardy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. O'Neal v. State“Only if the Court attempts to administer a longer sentence than what was originally conferred upon the defendant will it be considered double jeopardy. However, reinstating the suspended sentence first levied upon the defendant is proper and is not in violation of the double jeopardy clause as Brunson would suggest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Britt v. State“Miss.Code App. § 47-7-34 (Supp.1999) provides, in pertinent part, that “no part of the time that one is on probation shall be considered as any part of the time that he shall be sentenced to serve.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Britt v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.