796 So. 2d 399 - State v. Zimlich’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “`The fact that a statute of limitations defense is applicable is not a proper basis for issuing a writ of mandamus, due to the availability of a remedy by appeal.' Ex parte Southland Bank, 514 So.2d 954, 955 (Ala.1987).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 871 So. 2d 862 - Ex Parte Eubank · 847 So. 2d 386 - Ex Parte Hutcherson

2. ““WAYNE ZIMLICH, whose name is to the Grand Jury otherwise unknown than as stated, did, on or about October 9, 1995, after having been sworn to tell the truth, knowingly testified under that oath in an official proceeding, to-wit: a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama as follows: “ ‘Q. And according to the [EKG (echocardiogram) ] monitor this period, this second episode of bradycardia and hypotension would have lasted for what period of time? “ ‘A. About three minutes from the time it went down below like forty-three and I started to treat it until she responded to the drugs.’ “That said Wayne Zimlich did, on or about November 3, 1997, after having been sworn to tell the truth, knowingly testified under that oath at an official proceeding, to-wit: a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama as follows: “ ‘Q. Page eighty-one, I’ll read this, starting at line four (of a prior deposition of Wayne Zimlich), question: is it your testimony that the bradycardia in the second episode lasted three to five minutest?] ‘“A: Yes “ ‘Q: Is it your testimony that Ms. McGahagin would not have been bra-dycardic for longer than three to five minutes? “ ‘A: Correct, severe sinus bradycar-dia for longer than three to five minutes. “ ‘Q. That was a lie? “‘A. That was what we had decided we were going to say and that was not the truth. “ ‘Q. That’s not the truth? “ ‘A. That’s correct. [[Image here]] “That said Wayne Zimlich having knowingly made each said statem”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Zimlich v. State

3. ““The GRAND JURY of the County charge, that before the finding of this indictment, WAYNE ZIMLICH whose name is to the Grand Jury otherwise unknown than as stated, and, or on about October 9, 1995, during his examination as a witness after having been duly sworn to testify. truthfully in the trial of JAMES R. McGAHAGIN, et al., v. DR. ANTHONY SAVOIE, et al, CV-93-1571, in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama a jury trial alleging medical malpractice, which said court had authority to administer such oath, swear as follows: “Q. And according to the EKG monitor this period, this second episode of bradycardia and hypotension would have lasted for what .period of time? “A. About three minutes from the time it went down below like forty-three and I started to treat it until she responded to the drugs, and the matter so sworn to being material to a determination of whether or not there had been medical malpractice; and, “That said WAYNE ZIMLICH did,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Zimlich v. State