796 So. 2d 94 - State v. Landrum’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 443 So. 2d 522 - State v. Sweeney · 423 So. 2d 1116 - State v. Ray · 651 So. 2d 387 - State v. Toney · 408 So. 2d 250 - State v. Bolton · State v. Calloway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Except as may be provided by local rules of court in accordance with Articles 522 and 551, a defendant charged with a felony shall be present: (1) At arraignment; (2) When a plea of guilty, not guilty, or not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity is made; (3) At the calling, examination, challenging, impaneling, and swearing of the jury, and at any subsequent proceedings for the discharge of the jury or of a juror; 11 o(4) At all times during the trial when the court is determining and ruling on the admissibility of evidence; (5) In trials by jury, at all proceedings when the jury is present,.and in trials without a jury, at all times when evidence is being adduced; and . (6) At the rendition of the verdict or judgment, unless he voluntarily absents 'himself. * ''”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A. A defendant initially present fdr the commencement of trial shall not prevent thé further progress of'the trial, including the return of the verdict, and shall be considered to have waived his right to be present if his counsel is present or if the right to c'ounsel has been waived and: ' ' . (1) He voluntarily absents himself after the trial has commenced, whether or not he has. been informed by the court of his obligation to be present during the trial; or (2) After being warned by the court that disruptive conduct will cause him to be removed from the courtroom, he. persists in conduct which justifies his exclusion from the courtroom.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.