State v. Tipton’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Milliorn · State v. Olds · State v. Yowell · State v. Fitzgerald · Johns v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The motion to suppress in this case alleged that the specified articles were taken from the person of the defendants and premises in which they had an interest and were seized without a warrant. The unambiguous meaning of § 542.296.6 is that the State had the burden of going forward with the evidence to establish that this motion, which stated a factual basis for suppression, should be overruled. This would include evidence the defendants had “no standing” to make the complaints registered. The State failed to do so. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Childress
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.