Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. State · Payton v. State · Salazar v. State · 158 Tex. Crim. 133 - Ex Parte Bronson · Frame v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A challenge for cause is an objection made to a particular juror, alleging some fact which renders him incapable or unfit to serve on the jury. A challenge for cause may be made by either the state or the defense for any one of the following reasons: ... 3. That he is under indictment or other legal accusation for theft or any felony; [[Image here]] No juror shall be impaneled when it appears that he is subject to the second, third or fourth grounds of challenge for cause set forth above, although both parties may consent. All other grounds for challenge may be waived by the party or parties in whose favor such grounds of challenge exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holloway“A challenge for cause is an objection to a particular juror, alleging some fact which renders him incapable or unfit to serve on the jury. A challenge for cause may be made by either the state or the defense for any one of the following reasons: * * ⅜! * ⅝ ⅜”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cantu v. State“If upon motion for new trial, it be shown that one or more of the jurors impaneled was disqualified ..., a new trial shall be ordered, without regard to a showing of injury or probable injury or of consent or waiver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holloway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.