Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 796 S.W.2d 243 - Erdman v. State

Erdman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McCambridge v. State · Werner v. State · Turpin v. State · Jackson v. State · Miffleton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) All breath alcohol testing techniques, in order to be approved [by scientific director], shall meet, but not be limited to, the following: (1) a period during which the operator is required to remain in the presence of the subject; [[Image here]] (i) Subsection (e)(1) of this section requires an operator to remain in the presence of the subject. An operator shall remain in the presence of the subject at least 15 minutes before the test and should exercise reasonable care to ensure that the subject does not place any substances in the mouth. Direct observation is no longer necessary to ensure the validity or accuracy of the test result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.