Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

796 S.W.2d 31

Jost v. Jost

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1990

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1990-08-07

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1998

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-08-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The husband appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify a separation agreement. We affirm.

¶2An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/796/sw2d/31 · .json · Public domain