Brown v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2018
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Quisenberry v. Quisenberry · Whicker v. Whicker · Story v. Story · Davis v. Davis · Ruby v. Shouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the parties may settle their affairs with a finality beyond the reach of the court's continuing equitable jurisdiction elsewhere provided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jaburg v. Jaburg“may expressly preclude or limit modification of terms if the separation agreement so provides.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jaburg v. Jaburg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.