State v. Apalakis’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Mapp v. Ohio · Franks v. Delaware · Ornelas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established that law enforcement agents do not automatically exceed the bounds of permissible police conduct by telling a suspect that his or her cooperation would be `helpful' or that a confession would `make it better.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barros“The right of the people to be secure in their persons * * * against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Flores“we defer to the factual findings of the trial justice, applying a `clearly erroneous' standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Flores
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.