United States v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis
797 F.2d 1329 · 1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Berger v. United States · Raphan v. United States · Mathews v. Weber · Trammel v. United States · Williams v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may permit the defendant or his attorney and the attorney for the government to conduct the examination of prospective jurors or may itself conduct the examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We think that a magistrate can effectively conduct the voir dire and preside at the selection of juries in civil and criminal cases....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.